American pop singer Rihanna has tweeted tweets about the government burying iron nails on the road, shutting down internet services and building cement walls against the agitating farmers near India's capital Delhi. Rihanna wrote in her tweet that why such an incident should not be discussed on the world stage? ” Even with the voice of a woman, the central government of India is engaged in cleaning up its pro-celebrities rather than thinking of compromising with the farmers.
You should know that after the American pop singer Rihanna tweeted on the peasant movement, India's famous actress Kangana Ranaut through a tweet called the peasants who were agitating near Delhi to divide the country. After this, former cricketers Sachin Tendulkar, Anil Kumble and Ravi Shastri have tweeted with the hashtags "India Together" (India is united) and "India Against Propaganda" (India is against propaganda).
The farmers of Punjab, who were agitating near Delhi, stood on the streets of Delhi in the cool of December and January. And after that the Indian government started putting iron nails on the road to crush their movement. A woman voiced the world stage on this news. After this, India's celebrity has now endangered the unity and integrity of India. It would have been nice to tweet these celebrities of India in such a way that they would raise some voice in support of the farmer.
After Canada and Britain, now the US State Department has also given its knock on the ongoing farmers' movement in India. Commenting on the ongoing peasant movement in India, the State Department has said that peaceful protest is the hallmark of a strong democracy. With this, this Department of America has said that the three new laws of the Government of India will increase the usefulness of Indian markets and will encourage private sector investment.
The farmers of Punjab, who are agitating for the abolition of the three agricultural laws of Narendra Modi near Delhi, have to say the same to those farmers, Which the US State Department has said on the three agricultural laws of the Central Government. The agitating farmers say that after the implementation of the three agricultural laws of Narendra Modi, our agriculture will go in the hands of big traders of India. This will lead to the creation of a landowned farming system in India.
The strong democratic country of the world should know that it has not been a hundred years since the people of India got freedom from the Zamindari agricultural system. Farmers of India still celebrate Mahatma Gandhi's Champaran Satyagraha as an anniversary. The wounds of these farmers are still green and fresh. The people of India were more concerned with the zamindari agricultural system than the British rule. The people of India wanted freedom from the agricultural system of these landlords. If the landlords of India had done good job for the farmers of India, then why would Mahatma Gandhi have to carry out the Champaran Satyagraha movement in Bihar?
Comments