After all, why shouldn't Narendra Modi be considered guilty of the death of these farmers?

After all, how can it be accepted that the current political policies of India are being operated in a democratic way?

At present, the political policies of India are being conducted in such a way that it becomes clear that people are being cheated in the name of democracy in India. People of India are being given speeches like Tabaki of Jungle Book. A living example of this is the behavior of the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, with the agitating farmers near Delhi. This is the biggest proof that how the sepoys (agitating farmers) of India's democracy are being repressed in India? Other people of India should come forward in support of these soldiers of democracy (agitating farmers) so that there is justice for the farmers who are agitating near Delhi, the capital of India and India's democracy may also survive for a long time!

With the entry of industrial mafia Gautam Adani in India's agriculture sector and Prime Minister Narendra Modi helping them to take their business to the rural areas of India, the fear of financial bankruptcy of the farmers of the country has increased. Time has come to think about the safety of these farmers. On this the people of India should think very carefully and take a proper decision in support of the farmer so that the rural farmers of the country are safe and are involved in giving economic strength to the country. The more time the people of India take in this work, the more the farmers of India will lag behind and the result will be directly on the economic condition of the country.

It is a matter of great shame for any democratic country that a large group of farmers, who are considered to be the economic backbone of the country, are agitating near the capital of the country along with their elderly parents and wives and children. This movement is about to be a year old, the farmers of India have been agitating for their rights near the capital Delhi for about a year. For this, the Modi government used force many times, Modi called these farmers abusive while standing in the Parliament House of India, called these agitators harmful for the country, the people of Modi's team termed these farmers as terrorists and the Indian media also always proved these farmers wrong.

Dainik Jagran, India's national newspaper, crossed the limit, it broke the democratic boundary very mercilessly. An incident happened with the farmers agitating peacefully in which about 8-10 farmers were martyred. Some farmers were peacefully agitating on the road near Delhi in the area of ​​Uttar Pradesh, the state adjacent to the capital of India, and in the meantime, the son of the Minister of State of Narendra Modi's team trampled these farmers from behind from the Thar of Mahindra. Around 8-10 farmers were martyred in this incident. And the national news of India, Dainik Jagran, wrote the news of this incident, in whose news heading the farmers who were martyred were called rioters. Not only this, an IAS range officer of Haryana, adjoining Delhi, ordered to beat the peacefully agitating farmers by beating their heads with sticks. And later this officer beat the farmers mercilessly by breaking their heads. The Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi himself stood in the Parliament House and called these farmers abusive!

The only mistake of the farmers agitating near Delhi is that these people are agitating for their just rights. The root cause of this is the entry of industrial mafia like Gautam Adani into the agricultural sector of India. Adani is buying India's government property in such a way and is using that property in such a way that Adani's rule is implemented in India, not the rule of democracy. Sensing the intention of Adani, the farmers have intensified the demand for their rights. These people want their rights in writing from the government. But Narendra Modi only gives speech like a fox and in reality does something else. Is it wrong for the common man to agitate peacefully for his rights in a democratic country? If the country in which the people do not have this right, it means that there is no democracy in that country. And the same is happening in India. About 700 farmers of India have been martyred in this movement. Justice will be done to the families of these farmers when the law punishes their killers. And this is possible only when the judiciary of India takes legal action against the killers of farmers.

Now the question arises that the farmers of India, who are peacefully agitating near Delhi, the capital of India, have tolerated many atrocities of Modi. Narendra Modi has committed atrocities on these farmers like Hitler. Due to Modi's tyrannical and dictatorial decision 700 farmers were martyred, many families have been ruined financially and mentally. After all, why shouldn't the Indian court stand in support of these farmers? After all, why shouldn't Narendra Modi be considered guilty of the death of these farmers? After all, why shouldn't the people of India stand in support of these farmers and oust the dictatorial ruler like Narendra Modi from power? After all, how can it be accepted that the current political policies of India are being operated in a democratic way?